Financial metrics that I rarely consider

I find that I can eliminate most companies from consideration with just a handful of metrics. The metrics are:

  • The growth of the company's sales.
  • The growth of the company's earnings per share of stock outstanding.
  • The growth of the company's market value compared to its earnings.
  • The growth of the company's earnings before taking into account interest and taxes.
  • The value of the company compared to its earnings as compared to other similar companies.
  • The productivity of the company employees relative to industry averages.

I explain how to find these metrics in my book, "The Confident Investor" which is for sale in paperback format or ebook format wherever books are sold.

There are other metrics that are important but for one reason or another I do not actively analyze them. For the most part, I find that these other important metrics tend to be reflected directly into one of the above values or in the price of the stock.

Dividend Rate or Dividend Yield - The dividend that a company pays is almost always completely reflected in the price of the stock. If the company raises the dividend then the stock price goes up a similar amount. If the divided is cut, it drops (sometimes even farther than it should). Also, I have seen too many investors stay with a company that pays a high dividend as the stock price drops 25% because of poor performance of the fundamentals of the company. This is penny-wise and pound foolish.  Finally, in my opinion, dividends mean the company cannot figure out a great way to use the cash to grow their business and reduce costs. Companies that are 3rd or 4th in market share that issue dividends show a lack of management effectiveness.

Beta - I really don't think this matters too much. My system makes money when stocks go up and down. If a stock goes consistently up then I make more money.

Forward P/E - This number is a guess on what the price and earnings will be in the future. I would rather look at what the company's management has accomplished in the past than on a guess for the future.

Return on Equity, Assets, or Capital - I actually do look at these values before I pull the trigger on a new investment.  I want to see a good return here but I may not change my mind. I also don't really care what the ROE/A/C is 3 or 4 years ago.  Most of the metrics that I track, I want to improve over 10 years.

Debt to Equity - I casually look at this number but I have never disqualified a company because of it. I am far more worried about consistent growth of revenue and profit. If revenue and profit are growing at 10% or better over 10 years then this value will almost always be fine.

Revenue / Share - This number gets covered fairly adequately in watching the revenue top line. Dividing revenue by shares outstanding is a management game and not really relevant for analyzing the health of the company. As the management team buys back shares this gets reflected in the stock price which is the most important metric.

Institutional Ownership - I am not sure why anyone would buy or not buy a stock based on this number.  What does it matter? If the number is really high that means that professional and trained money managers like the company. If the number is lower than it is usually because the company has a good brand name and individual investors buy it because they think it is cool. Either way, it is rarely the fault of the company as to this number.

Free Cash Flow - A lot of people look at this number. It is important. Of all the metrics that I don't put on my scorecard, I think this is the most valuable. However, since it is based on EBIT and profit to some degree I feel that it sufficiently is reflected in the metrics that I specifically cover.  Also, I am not convinced that FCF needs to increase consistently over time like the metrics that I monitor. I will occasionally not invest in a company that has poor FCF but passes my other metrics.

3 Comments

  1. Beta is the sensitivity to the market, it is a measure of systematic risk. If the Beta is high,it means you are exposed to the macro economic sector/region the company operates in. Therefore, if you are risk adverse, diversify to minimise.

  2. Worth noting growth of sales and ROCE are easily manipulated by management. Would recommend P/E, EPS.

  3. Author

    Oliver – Your understanding of beta is correct however with my system, this is a way to make money. Because I can effectively track and react to price increases/decreases, I can make money on the changes where a simple buy and hold approach would end up staying essentially stagnant.

    Regarding, P/E and EPS, yes those are quite important. As I say in the top of my article (and other places on this site) I watch those indicators quite closely. However, Sales is incredibly important and should NOT be discounted. Continuously increasing sales will cover up a large number of inefficiencies in a company that are difficult to fix. Sales increasing is far better than Sales decreasing in nearly all cases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.