Comparing mutual fund rating systems from Lipper and Morningstar

rating photoA balanced portfolio should include great companies and mutual fund stock indexes. In order to effectively buy a mutual fund, you should evaluate its performance using one of the mutual fund rating systems. Both the Morningstar and Lipper mutual fund rating systems provide comparative ranking of fund performance ranging from 1 year to 10 years. The primary difference lies in the metrics used to determine which funds rank highest to lowest in a category (i.e. peer group).

Morningstar mutual fund rating system overview

The Morningstar system relies on a single metric: a calculation of risk-adjusted return. The risk adjustment incorporates a utility function to reflect how investors’ trade-off return and risk for factors such as loss aversion. Also, Morningstar will adjust for taxes in its risk-adjusted return calculation if most investors in that fund qualify for the same tax treatment. The resulting risk-adjusted returns are segmented into five categories (1 to 5 stars) based on a bell-shaped (i.e. normal) distribution.

Lipper mutual fund rating system overview

The Lipper system evaluates fund performance using metrics which determine the overall ranking for a fund. These five metrics are

  1. Total return (not risk-adjusted)
  2. Consistency of Return
  3. Preservation of Capital
  4. Fund Expense
  5. Tax Efficiency

One advantage of the Lipper system is that investors can dig into an overall Lipper ranking to determine which of these five metrics played a crucial role. Funds within the same peer group are ranked into one of five categories numbered 1 to 5 (best to worst) using a flat distribution of 20% each so that an equal number of funds are assigned to each performance category. Lipper also provides an overall fund rating based on total return with capital gains and dividends re-invested.

Morningstar Mutual Fund Rating System Methodology

Morningstar Ratings has the following characteristics:

  • Mutual funds are evaluated against a peer group
  • Ratings are based on the funds’ risk-adjusted returns

Within each Morningstar Category, the top 10% of funds receive five stars, and the bottom 10% receives one star. The 4-star category encompasses 22.5% of the peer group as does the 2-star category (immediately above the 1-star category). The middle category (3 stars) contains the remaining 35% of funds.

Funds are rated for up to three time-periods:three-, five-, and 10-years. These multi-year ratings are combined to produce an overall score.

Ratings are objective, based entirely on a mathematical evaluation of risk-adjusted past performance. They’re a useful tool for identifying funds worthy of further research, but shouldn’t be considered buy or sell signals.

Lipper Mutual Fund Rating System Methodology

Lipper ranks mutual funds according to a peer-based performance system which measures returns according to specific time frames and fund classifications (small, mid, multi and large-cap). Mutual fund returns are assigned a rank that places each fund within a group – the lower the number rank, the better the fund performed compared to other funds in the classification group. For example, a rank of 24 indicates that the fund has the 24th best rate of return in its category. In effect, Lipper ranking reflects how well the fund performed compared to its peers for a given period. Because the number of mutual funds in a classification group can vary widely, Lipper also calculates a percentile measure for each fund.

Lipper ratings are derived from formulas that analyze funds against clearly defined criteria. Funds are ranked against their peers on each of five measures:

  1. Total Return
  2. Consistent Return
  3. Preservation
  4. Expense
  5. Tax Efficiency

Each of these criteria is defined below:
Scores are subject to change every month and are calculated for the following periods: 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and overall. The overall calculation is based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods (if applicable). For each measure, the highest 20% of funds in each peer group are named Lipper Leaders. The next 20% receive a rating of 2; the middle 20% are rated 3; the next 20% are rated 4, and the lowest 20% are rated 5.

  1. Total Return – A Lipper Leader for Total Return is a fund that has provided superior total returns when compared to a group of similar funds.
  2. Consistent Return – A Lipper Leader for Consistent Return is a fund that has provided superior consistency and risk-adjusted returns when compared to a group of similar funds.
  3. Preservation – A Lipper Leader for Preservation is a fund that has demonstrated a superior ability to preserve capital in a variety of markets when compared with its peers.
  4. Expense – Lipper Leaders for Expense are funds that have successfully managed to keep its expenses low relative to its peers and within its load structure.
  5. Tax Efficiency – A Lipper Leader for Tax Efficiency is a fund that has been successful at postponing taxes over the measurement period relative to similar funds.

Photo by jvleis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.