By:
On:
In: Commentary
With: 0 Comments

If Uncle Sam got a bigger chunk of your paycheck last year than you’d like – or if you’re dreading the big check you’ll have to write on April 15 – it might cheer you up to look forward to some new tax breaks for 2010. The IRS generally introduces tax changes as the year progresses, but some new tax breaks that have already been announced can help lower your tax bill this year (and next year).

I tend to stay away from offering too much tax advice. In general, good advice only comes with a solid conversation about your particular situation. If you do not have a tax adviser helping you, you probably should.

Investopedia details a few that you should investigate. Jump over there and read the full article but here is a quick list:

  • Homebuyer Credit
  • Earned Income Tax Credit
  • No More Limits on Roth Conversions
  • Haiti Relief Donations
  • Making Work Pay Credit
  • Homebuyer Credit

By:
On:
In: Commentary
With: 0 Comments

I picked this up over at Investopedia. This is a great article about losing money using Leveraged ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds). While there are some investment vehicles that make sense (such as index funds) there are some that simply don’t work out once you understand them.  This is the case with leveraged funds.  Rather than re-explain the math here, I suggest that you jump over to Investopedia to read it.  Below are some hightlights:

Have you ever wondered how you can make sure that your portfolio loses money? For those of you who are tired of that extra cash weighing down your pockets and would rather just lose it aimlessly than give it to a worthy cause, I found the ideal investment: levered [sic-leveraged] exchange traded funds.
*******
Consider a hypothetical stock that is tracked by two double-levered [sic] ETFs, one bull, one bear. Since the debt portion of the instrument must consistently be rebalanced to ensure a proper debt-to-equity ratio, the funds track the daily performance of the stock rather than the overall annual percent change. Suppose this stock, with an initial value of $100 experiences a 25% price decline, followed by a 25% increase and then a 6.67% increase to bring its price back up to $100. A double-levered bull ETF would have a terminal value of $85 ($100*1.50*0.50*1.133) while the inverse fund would be worth only $65 ($100*0.50*1.50*0.87). This is, of course, before we factor in the management expense ratio. Essentially, despite the trend in the market, these instruments will lose value due to the daily volatility of the underlying asset.

By:
On:
In: Commentary
Tagged: , ,
With: 0 Comments

From CNBC’s Mad Money:

Jim Cramer (text from Newsbusters.org):

The number you need to watch is the number that Scott Brown racks up against Martha Coakley in this amazing Massachusetts Senate race. I say amazing ’cause this was supposed to be a walkover. I mean, even a few weeks ago it was a lock for Democrat Coakley. But now everything’s up in the air, and a Brown win would be devastating for the president’s agenda. Let’s put Brown, okay, and I don’t mean UPS which I happen to own for my charitable trust. Particularly on healthcare reform, because Republican Brown has said he will definitely vote against the plan.

Brown in the Senate? That wrecks the 60-vote supermajority the Democrats have been counting on. It could spell the end for this almost year-long nightmare of a piece of healthcare legislation.

What does a Brown election mean larger than this? Well, first you’re going to get a knee-jerk rally in all the so-called penalized stocks — the HMOs, the drugs, the medical device-makers. I call it “knee-jerk,” though, because these stocks have been on fire for months. Look at Cramer fave WellPoint, or United Health. 52 week high. 52 week high. Merck, 52 week high. It’s been clear as a bell that the healthcare reform wasn’t going to affect most healthcare stocks. That’s versus what we thought last year.

More important, though, I think investors who are nervous about the dictatorship of the Pelosi proletariat will feel at ease, and we could have a gigantic rally off a Coakley loss and a Brown win. It will be a signal that a more pro-business, less pro-labor government could be in front of us. Hey, would you say it is more China like perhaps? No, we can never be as capitalist as the Communist Chinese. But how about a little bit less like the old Soviet Union? Yeah, that would be a bit more like it. Pelosi politburo emasculation! Everything from the banks, which are usually in the Democrats’ penalty box, or the oils which are despised by this administration for being carbon, could be propelled dramatically higher all of this Tuesday night.

By:
On:
In: Commentary
Tagged: ,
With: 0 Comments

I am not a bit surprised that Leno is in trouble at NBC. Moving that format to 10P in the 21st century was foolish. It may have been okay in the 50s or 60s but that show was doomed the day that Jay Leno walked on to the stage.

Of course, it doesn’t help that Conan is a flop in the 11:30 time slot.

The executives that put this together should be fired. It should be the first thing that Comcast does now that they have control of the company from GE. Fire the buffoons that did this. Talk about destroying a valuable commodity! Warren Buffet says that you should only invest in companies that can be profitable even if idiots run them. I don’t know if I agree with that advice but I definitely don’t think you should invest in companies that are run by buffoons!

This must be why GE does so badly in my Confident Investor Rating – they simply do not know how to drive the value of their products.  Hopefully, Comcast will do better.

By:
On:
In: Commentary
With: 0 Comments

The absolute best investment that you can make is to pay off your higher interest loans!

If you are carrying any credit card debt, you are probably paying double digit interest rates. This is short term money so you have to put yourself on a budget and pay these debts off. Whatever your current interest rate on your credit card, that is exactly the interest rate you will effectively earn by paying off that short-term debt. In today’s economy, I don’t know of any other legal investment that will GUARANTEE your return at double digit percentage rates.

If you have a car payment that is over 6% interest rate, that is also a likely target for accelerated payments. Once again, a 6.9% loan on your car means that you are guaranteed to get 6.9% return by paying the loan off more quickly (minus inflation). Since car loans rarely go longer than 60 months, this is medium term money (as opposed to short-term for credit cards). If you don’t need the extra $100 in the next month, spend that money on your car loan.

However, you may have bought your car with a subsidized loan from the manufacturer and therefore paying a very low rate that is approaching 0%. In that case, you may want to slow down this payment and only pay the minimum amount that you can. Essentially, inflation will grow faster than your interest rate so your cash equivalent spending will go down over the course of time. In this case, you are earning whatever the inflation rate is in interest!

Your home loan is probably different. Chances are you have been able to drive your interest rate down below 8 or 9%. Your home loan may still be 10, 20 or more years left so any money that you put into it is very long-term. You may need this money before the 10 years are up and if that is the case then it will be quite expensive to get it back out. It is reasonable to pay a bit extra on your home loan but be careful that it doesn’t impact your regular cash flow – and pay off your credit cards first!

In order to do all this, you need to start budgeting your money. Check out these sites for some advice on how to successfully budget your money.

[save] Budgeting for Dummies

How to budget your money for debt relief

The Fluid Budget